http://www.earthmatrix.com Examine the relationships of astronomical data, mathematical models, the laws of geometry, and how all of that possibly became interpreted and translated into the ancient artwork and is now relevant to science today. en_US http://www.earthmatrix.com/giflink/logo3.jpg http://www.earthmatrix.com 151 39 http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/formula_equation.html The E^2 term predetermines deriving the square root of 382624392.1. But, actually the result on the right side of the equation is in reality the eighteenth power of c, the speed of light in vacuo. http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/einstein_formula.html When mass is employed as numerical value 2.17644, as in Planck mass, the seventh power of c, then the energy term (E), whether squared or not in the equations produces a fractal multiple of Planck energy, 1.9561, the ninth power of the speed of light in a vacuum. http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/mass_confusion.html Continuing with the search powers of c, much to my surprise, c9 is 1.956078711 ---the value that Planck energy is suggesting, 1.9561, only rounded off. http://www.earthmatrix-muniments.com/id14.html Planck mass = c^7, Planck momentum = c^8, Planck energy c^9: c = the speed of light in vacuo. http://earthmatrix.com/einstein/fractal_multiples.html The symbolic formula provided in the literature for Planck energy [1.9561] is (Sq rt of hc^5/G), why has a complicated symbolic formula for a matter-energy event been devised when that value may be expressed theoretically as c^9 ? http://earthmatrix.com/ Charles William Johnson, in his most recent book, Einstein's Formula: Mass Confusion [Earth/matriX Editions], shows that Einstein's formula has its origin in the imaginary formula c9 = c7 c2, and does not represent the conversion of mass|energy. http://earthmatrix-muniments.com/id15.html The fact that the numerical values of many fundamental constants represent fractal multiples of powers of the speed of light in a vacuum is not just some mathematical device to derive the symbolic equations/formulae forwarded in the CODATA. http://earthmatrix-muniments.com/id5.html The proposal to employ Planck’s Constant and/or Avogadro’s constant for redefining the kilogram caught my attention immediately. As I have recently written an extensive critique of how the Planck constant appears to be based on contradictory, if not erroneous theoretical computations. http://earthmatrix.com/index2.html I have illustrated how one may derive Planck implied values, that is, numerical values as of the Planck constants. The manner in which the Planck implied values are generated is by multiplying each Planck constant times the elementary charge [1.602176487]. http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/impact_asteroids.html ooks are beginning to appear now about what the year 2012 may mean, now that other books have lost attention, which cited the years 2002 and 2005 as having been the potentially catastrophic years for the Earth. http://earthmatrix.com/sciencetoday/tableconstants136.html Corresponding 1.36+ Fractal Values (24 constants)