Einstein's Formula: A Special Case
Forget about E = mc2 Learn how E3 = m1c2 works...
Have you ever felt intimidated by Einstein's famous formula? No need to be; he appears to have used simple math. So, I bet you never thought Einstein's formula would take a hit. Well, it is easy to do when you consider the E = mc2 equation from the perspective of simple math. Forget about the algebraic notation and consider the numbers behind the terms. The E = mc2 equation's notation hides its actual computational procedure. The E = mc2 equation is really E3 = m1c2
Basic, elementary algebra is all that is required to understand how it works, or doesn't work. Everyone seems to have forgotten that you have to sum the powers on the right side, and when you do that, the left side of the equation, logically and mathematically means the cube of the so-called energy term.
c3 = c1c2 the Baseline of E3 = m1c2
Learn the mathematical intricacies and the theoretical foundation of Einstein's formula regarding its terms, powers and numerical values.
Check it out. Purchase and download this essay on the baseline of Einstein's
equation. All you need to know is how to add, divide, multiply and consider
ideas about terms, powers and numbers. There is no higher math in Einstein's
formula. In fact, you may even conclude that it was produced out of confusion.
Decide for yourself. Here are the numbers to make that decision. But,
don't be content with just examining a summary of the outcome of this
analysis, consider all of the details in the computations. For that you
should read the entire essay, and by so doing you also support the Earth/matriX
project which has been on the web for over thirteen years now, providing
free content about science and ancient artwork. We have begun charging
some fees for certain material, as we hope to dedicate ourselves full-time
to research and analysis. There is still going to be a lot of freebies
for viewing, but some things will generate a fee. Like this essay, which
we are certain you will profit from by learning how Einstein's famous
formula may be deficient in some ways. Download the entire essay and decide
for yourself.
 |
 |
 |
||
Our Price $17.95 Paperback In Stock |
Our Price $19.95 Paperback In Stock |
Our Price $18.95 Paperback In Stock |
||
The physics paradigm today is based mainly upon the concept of c-square, the squaring of the speed of light in a vacuum. Numerous fundamental physical and chemical constants provided in the physics literature [CODATA] reflect numerical values based upon powers of c, the speed of light in vacuo. The speed of light in a vacuum is determined to represent the upper limit of movement of mass|energy by physicists. |
The upper speed limit for a light photon is 299792458 meters/second. The square of that number produces a numerical value that does not exist in any form of matter-energy. The c-square actually represents a number that corresponds to a near massless event: a light photon. The author goes beyond a critique of Albert Einstein’s famous formula based upon this unreal number. The rejection of Einstein’s formula is explored through basic math, the summation of powers in the equation’s terms. |
A common procedure followed in deriving many of the CODATA recommendations is to divide certain fundamental physical constants by the value of the elementary charge, e, 1.602176487. With regard to the Planck constants and units of measurement, the case is argued that Max Planck may have simply reversed engineered this procedure in order to derive his natural units. |
Read an excerpt of the essay:
Einstein's Formula: A Special Case
c3 = c1c2 the Baseline of E3 = m1c2
Charles William Johnson
©December 2010 Copyrighted.
Earth/matriX: Science Today
ISBN 1-58616-470-8
Previously, the relationship c9 = c7c2 as the basis for Einstein's famous formula: E = mc2, was treated in the Earth/matriX essays. The demonstration is elementary as of the suggested numerical values frequently cited for Einstein's equation. The speed of light in a vacuum (c) to the ninth power is 19560.78711; to the seventh power, it is 2176.431087; and to the square it is 8.987551787. The decimal places may vary in using cms, meters or kilometers, etc.
Aside from this formulation, from the point of view of the stated terms of Einstein's equation, the baseline equation for Einstein's formula relates to that of c3 = c1c2. However, before entering the analysis of the terms themselves in this manner, it is first necessary to further examine the basis of c9 = c7c2 regarding the numerical values of the terms.
Understandably, then, these numerical values correspond to today's values for Planck energy [1.9561], Planck mass [2.17644] and, customarily for the square of the speed of light in vacuo [2.99792458]. By employing these internationally accepted values, the c9 = c7c2 may substitute the equation E = mc2 or, inversely of course.
In this sense, Einstein's formula represents a specific case of equivalencies regarding the speed of light in a vacuum, rather than the general transfer of mass|energy as stated throughout the scientific literature.
...
Consider now in detail once again the baseline equation [ c3 = c2 c1 ] upon which the terms of Einstein's equation rest, in relation to the basic equation [c9 =c7 c2] upon which the numerical values of Einstein's formula rest.
c3 = c2 c1 [ = Einstein's equation for all numbers other than those of mass 2.17644]...
c9 = c7c2 [= Einstein's equation for Planck mass 2.17644 ]
...
Therefore, in a strict sense, even though the numbers of Einstein's equation when employed classically as 1.9561 | 2.17644 | 8.987551787 reflect the equation c9 = c7c2, the terms' word-concepts regarding algebraic notation misleadingly reflect the baseline equation of powers c3 = c1c2 .
In other words, Einstein's formula as stated, E = mc2 , represents and takes for granted
c3 = c1c2; given the fact that its terms represent E3 = m1c2.
There is no mathematical way to avoid the conclusion that E reflects the summation of powers of mc, as this is understood from the algebraic notation used in the formula.
....
Consequently, it is possible to make the case either way: that Einstein's formula is plagued by confusion and inconsistencies [mixing up terms, powers and numerical values] or, that it is the result of a subsequent conscious mathematical manipulation of its terms and powers. And this situation obtains not necessarily due to Einstein himself, given the fact that he never really forwarded this supposed equation in the form that it exists today. Either way, a serious critical examination of the history of physics for the past 105 years appears to be in order.
===
You may think that with this excerpt you now know how Einstein's formula works, or not. But, this is just the initial analysis. Consider the entire critical reasoning process behind this essay. Read all of the computational steps to get the complete picture of Einstein's famous formula, and possibly some of its shortcomings and problems of basic mathematical design. After you read the Earth/matriX essays about Einstein's formula, you will definitely not be able to view it in the manner as you did prior to reading these critical comments. That which seemed complex before, now actually will appear even simplistic in a certain sense. Follow all of the mathematical steps, purchase the complete analysis now. Start a classroom discussion around these ideas with your teacher's assistance. It was also said that Einstein used high-school math to develop some of his equations. That may be all too true. Check it out.
|
|
|
||
Our Price $17.95 Paperback In Stock |
Our Price $19.95 Paperback In Stock |
Our Price $18.95 Paperback In Stock |
||
The physics paradigm today is based mainly upon the concept of c-square, the squaring of the speed of light in a vacuum. Numerous fundamental physical and chemical constants provided in the physics literature [CODATA] reflect numerical values based upon powers of c, the speed of light in vacuo. The speed of light in a vacuum is determined to represent the upper limit of movement of mass|energy by physicists. |
The upper speed limit for a light photon is 299792458 meters/second. The square of that number produces a numerical value that does not exist in any form of matter-energy. The c-square actually represents a number that corresponds to a near massless event: a light photon. The author goes beyond a critique of Albert Einstein’s famous formula based upon this unreal number. The rejection of Einstein’s formula is explored through basic math, the summation of powers in the equation’s terms. |
A common procedure followed in deriving many of the CODATA recommendations is to divide certain fundamental physical constants by the value of the elementary charge, e, 1.602176487. With regard to the Planck constants and units of measurement, the case is argued that Max Planck may have simply reversed engineered this procedure in order to derive his natural units. |
-0-
Charles William Johnson Earth/matriX: Science Today
P.O. Box 231126, New orleans, Louisiana 70183-1126, USA
www.earthmatrix.com www.earthmatrix-muniments.com
johnson@earthmatrix.com
©December 2010 Copyrighted. All rights reserved. reproduction prohibited.
Einstein's Formula: Mass Confusion
Fundamental Physical Constants Notes:
Fractal Multiples and Einstein's Equation
Einstein's Formula and Variations of Redundancies