Charles William Johnson,
The Earth/matriX Thermodynamic Temperature Scale.
Tape Bound: 81pp. Published by Earth/matriX, New Orleans, Louisiana, ISBN-1-58616-194-6

Various scales exist for measuring the thermodynamic temperature of energy-matter at 1 atm: Fahrenheit, Rankine, Reaumur, Celsius, and Kelvin scales. Conversions from one scale to another can be quite difficult. And, in order to achieve a certain standard there exists the International Temperature Scale of 1990, ITS-90. The development of these scales has been rather empirical in nature, and visualizing or comparing temperatures from one scale to another or, even within the same scale is at times difficult to achieve.

Our studies of the ancient reckoning system of time have led us to propose the Earth/matriX Thermodynamic Temperature Scale, which overcomes some of the cited problems of conversion and comparison. The Earth/matriX scale is based on two separate ranges: a measurement when the boiling point of water (BPW) is taken as the unit one (1.00) or, when the freezing point of water (FPW) is taken as the unit one (1.00). In fact, the unit one may be any fractal number thereof: .10, 1.0, 10.0, 100.0, 1000.0, etc.

By tagging the boiling/freezing point of water at 100, then any temperature expressed on the scale immediately communicates the number of times it is greater/lesser than the boiling and freezing point of water. This also allows for comparison among the temperatures listed.

The Kelvin scale consists of the boiling point of water at 373.16, and the freezing point of water at 273.16. Therefore, in order to achieve the Earth/matriX scale, the boiling point of water on the TS1 scale results from the relationship of 373.16 divided by 273.16 equals 136.60992129. This figure represents the number of units for the range of the Earth/matriX scale between the boiling point of water and the zero of absolute zero. The ancient reckoning system of the maya reveals a seemingly relational number in the maya companion number 1366560. This number is examined in the light of the scalar number cited above.

One can only attribute such a similarity of numbers to be related to a mere coincidence. However, the author then examines the relationship of the polar radius to the equatorial radius of the Earth, and finds a factor of 1.366050662 resulting thereof. Other historically significant numbers arise from these computations, whereby we observe the appearance of the Nineveh number 1959552 in relationship to the figures of the polar radius (1.366) and the equatorial radius (1.368). The range between the polar cap and the Equator reflects precisely a relationship of 1.366050662, a number extremely similar to the ancient maya companion number (1366560). Other historical significant numbers come into view in the computations such as the 819c and the 13c.

In the book The Earth/matriX Thermodynamic Temperature Scale, the author proposes a distinct measuring scale as of the boiling/freezing points of water in relation to the unit fractal one. And, reveals how the polar radius and the equatorial radius of the Earth, in fact, reflects just such a relationship. Then, the data are examined in the light of the ancient calendrical reckoning system. One may question whether the ancients actually knew of these relations. But, to find the numbers of the temperature scale, not only within the ancient reckoning system, but within the relationship of the polar radius to the equatorial radius, somehow defies everything that we now know about science.

TEMPERATURE SCALES AND ANCIENT RECKONING Ancient reckoning numbers reflect a historically significant fractal number of 1.366. The relationship between the boiling and freezing points of water is also a fractal expression of a 1.366 number. Random coincidence? The author thinks not. Different thermodynamic temperature scales based on unit one are derived and presented in an effort to overcome the incomparable and difficult to manage numbers of the existing temperature scales. Also learn what the square root of three has to do with the temperature scales and the boiling/freezing points of water. By assigning either the boiling or freezing points of water the unit 1.0, the different scales become easily comparable, and the gradation scales become relevant for other measurements such as the chemical and physical constants of matter-energy.